PlayStation gamer for life!

Yo Mama

Contributor
CRank: 6Score: 77410

The only people who think it's not worth another $60 are the people who have never played it.

4321d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

It looks pretty good to be the first iteration on new hardware. But, to be honest, next years version will look noticeably better. That's the way it's always been for The Show.

4324d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hahah, I know a Nintendo fanboy isn't online trying to talk smack. I've seen it all now.

But anyway, as far as I know, none of those games had artificial intelligence. Every player was controlled by a real gamer.

Titanfall, on the other hand, has A.I controlled enemies. Terrible cloud controlled ones at that. Behold DA POWERZ OF THE CLOUDZ!

4326d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Mmm hmm, that cloud computing did wonders for the A.I in Titanfall./s

Which begs the question. Would the A.I be even dumber if the players internet went down? Is that even possible to be even worse? Oh wait, it's an online only game. Nice, Microsoft. Very sneaky. I see what you did there.

4327d ago 8 agree6 disagreeView comment

Although I would love for this to be true I just don't see it happening. Think of all the relationships, business wise and casual that Microsoft and Activision has with professional gamers because of the COD World Championship. Do you think Activision is going to go and tell them they have to switch now? I doubt it.

If anything they'll just drop the exclusive DLC and make it available on both platforms at the same time.

4329d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Do they really need to ask us if we'd like to be able to see when a friend comes online? Jeez, that should be standard.

4331d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

All I know is that I played the other inFamous titles and didn't like them as much as I do Second Son. I got the platinum last night. I do wish there was more to do after beating it though.

4332d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is not the PS4 version. It's PS3.

4338d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Do people still visit Lens Of Truth? Serious question.

4340d ago 11 agree6 disagreeView comment

All that technical talk may be true, but you know? You said all that and it still doesn't change the fact that the PS4 version of Ass Creed 4 is barely discernible from the PS3 version.

http://youtu.be/seCR6eifk4E...

4340d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I have AC 4 and "gorgeous" is not a word I would use to describe it on PS4. It's just "ok". It looks exactly like what it is. A PS3 game with better textures.

4341d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

To everyone who is saying they are excited to get this based on the graphics. Have you learned nothing from the WatchDogs downgrade fiasco? Don't get your hopes up. Gameplay WILL NOT look that good. Ubisoft marketing at it's best. SMH

4341d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

Double Post

4344d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

I'll never be a XboxOne gamer, but I have to hand it to M$. They always listen to their fans and get them FW updates asap. Whereas, Sony seems content with slow dripping useful features we've been begging for, issuing stability patches and acting as if we should be grateful they even give us that.

That's one area Sony is getting their butt whooped. They need to step it up and be more transparent and community focused when it comes to updates.

4344d ago 20 agree12 disagreeView comment

@Abriael

"And the headline is fact. Of course there isn't space to explain the whole article in the headline."

Bull.

"Metacritic shows it's inherently flawed. Less reviewed X-1 Ground Zeroes scores higher than PS4."

There. Was that so hard? Stop acting like you didn't name it what you did for clicks.

4344d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

You're missing the point. No one is arguing that the metacritic system isn't flawed. We're saying that you left out the fact that the PS4 was reviewed many more times than the X-One version from your headline until you click and visit your article on Dualshockers....which is a bit misleading.

Your article title needs to be changed. If the Metacritic system is flawed, then why doesn't your headline reflect that? Oh yeah, because it's clickbait.

4344d ago 14 agree2 disagreeView comment

Stupid Dualshockers putting up misleading headline for hits. Imagine that. This reflects poorly on Giuseppe.

4344d ago 20 agree4 disagreeView comment

I didn't really like the first two so much. I just felt like it was missing something. Like the city was too generic and each part of it was indistinguishable from the other parts. However, I may have to steal my girlfriends copy of this one. It looks way better so far.

4350d ago 0 agree9 disagreeView comment

110% correct on everything he said. Developers are in love with wrapping noose's around their neck and kicking the chairs from beneath them.

If Ubisoft wouldn't have shown the E3 2012 demo of Watch_Dogs running on a high end PC with PlayStation controls mapped on screen, they wouldn't be in this predicament.

I'd almost rather not even see the game at all until it's finished than get all hyped up and be let down like I was with Watch_Dogs....

4352d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

This article is cute. I remember when I had my first beer...

4353d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment